38 Degrees Logo38 Degrees Logo 38 Degrees Logo

Posts Tagged ‘Election’

Lobbying – The Next Scandal?

March 14th, 2010 by

As reported in the Observer this morning,  we’ve teamed up with the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency to challenge Prospective Parliamentary Candidates (PPCs) on their lobbying links and to urge all PPCs to pledge to support a  statutory register of lobbying activity – so the public can find out who is trying to influence our politicians.

Get Involved – Take Action
Click on the links below if you live in the constiuencies highlighted to find out more and take action. If you don’t live in the constituencies listed you can still ask your PPCs to support lobbying transparency - just click here to get started.

Witham – Priti Patel (Conservative)

Priti hasn’t been completely transparent with voters about her links to lobbying. Priti works for global PR and political lobbying firm, Weber Shandwick. But her campaign website only mentions that she is a director of a company providing “business and communication strategy” advice.
Portsmouth North – Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
Penny describes herself on her campaign website as a “healthcare consultant”. But according to official documents, Penny is also a director and minority shareholder of a London-based media and lobbying firm, Media Intelligence Partners (MIP), which she co-founded six years ago. The company boasts of its “excellent contacts among senior Conservative politicians”.
Redruth – George Eustice (Conservative)
George hasn’t been completely transparent with voters about his links to lobbying. George is a commercial lobbyist with a firm called Portland PR. But there is no mention of this on his campaign website.
Wolverhampton North East  - Emma Reynolds (Labour)
Emma currently works for a commercial lobbying firm, Cogitamus, where she “plays a leading role… providing a contemporary understanding of the Whitehall and Westminster scene”. Until we contacted her, her campaign website, didn’t mention this job

Priti hasn’t been completely transparent with voters about her links to lobbying. Priti works for global PR and political lobbying firm, Weber Shandwick. But her campaign website only mentions that she is a director of a company providing “business and communication strategy” advice.

Portsmouth North – Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
Penny describes herself on her campaign website as a “healthcare consultant”. But according to official documents, Penny is also a director and minority shareholder of a London-based media and lobbying firm, Media Intelligence Partners (MIP), which she co-founded six years ago. The company boasts of its “excellent contacts among senior Conservative politicians”.

Redruth – George Eustice (Conservative)
George hasn’t been completely transparent with voters about his links to lobbying. George is a commercial lobbyist with a firm called Portland PR. But there is no mention of this on his campaign website.

Wolverhampton North East  - Emma Reynolds (Labour)
Emma currently works for a commercial lobbying firm, Cogitamus, where she “plays a leading role… providing a contemporary understanding of the Whitehall and Westminster scene”. Until we contacted her, her campaign website, didn’t mention this job.

Contact your PPCs
If you don’t live in the constituencies mentioned above you can still get involved – just click here to ask all your PPCs to get pledge to support lobbying transparancy. It only takes two minutes.

The next big scandal?

Last month David Cameron, leader of the Conservative party, warned that “lobbying is next political scandal” waiting to happen – yet still some PPCs still aren’t disclosing their links to the lobbying industry.
The election is a chance to clean up parliament, which is why it’s time for all PPCs to be totally transparent about their lobbying links. Click here contact your PPCs now – it only takes a few minutes.

Posted in 38 Degrees Blog Posts

Tags: ,

Election TV Debates: let us ask the questions

February 11th, 2010 by

Party leaders will debate before the election

Party leaders will debate before the election

With the 38 Degrees’ general election consultation in its final phase, one of the ideas that has emerged has already become a campaign. Several people suggested that the TV leadership debates in the run-up to the general election would be a good way for us to get involved: it’s a chance to make sure that ordinary voters get heard, rather than just the usual suspects.

So, we were concerned when we saw the news that politicians and their spin doctors are already squabbling about how to make the debates work. There’s a danger that it will become another opportunity for polished political performances, without putting our would-be leaders on the spot about the issues that we care about.

At first, these debates seemed like a step in the right direction. But there can’t be open debate if the people that count – the voters – are left out. The party leaders and their teams want to control everything about the debates, so that nothing will be able to spoil their image. That means no questions from the audience and no real debate.

Now, we’re taking action to call on the party leaders to let voters choose and ask the majority of questions during the TV debates. We want to quiz the party leaders directly on the issues that matter to us, like climate change, public services and bankers’ bonuses.

Click here to join the campaign for real debates between the party leaders at election time, so we can get the answers we need to decide who to vote for on polling day: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/open-up-election-debates

Posted in 38 Degrees Blog Posts

Tags: , , , , ,

The election consultation – useful links

January 15th, 2010 by

A couple of people have got in touch with us asking questions about the election consultation. Here are the answers to the most common questions.

How do I get involved?
Thousands of 38 Degrees members from every corner of the UK are helping us decide what we should do in the election right now. To get involved just sign up here: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/2010-election and we’ll send you login details within 24 hours.

I’ve lost my login details:
Don’t worry. Just go here to get a reminder sent to you very soon http://38degrees.achordus.net/member/getreminder

How do I use Achordus:
We’ve prepared a quick slide show to show you around the forum. Watch it below

I’ve got other questions – who should I contact: To contact the moderator team email support@achordus.com

Posted in 38 Degrees Blog Posts

Tags: , , ,

The optimism of the action is better than the pessimism of the thought.

January 13th, 2010 by

Our general election consultation has got off to a great start. Thousands of us have signed up to discuss what strategy 38 Degrees should adopt in the run up to May 2010, and there’s a clear sense of energy and purpose in the consultation space.

At the moment we’ve got four discussions running in the space: What are the best and worst outcomes of the election? What are the key issues for us to focus on during the election? How much should we do during the general election? What tactics could we try?

I’ve been taking a look at some of the conversations we’ve been having. One of the busiest areas of discussion so far has been electoral reform. Some of us are fed up with a system that puts the power to determine an election result in the hands of a few voters in marginal seats. As one person put it, “electoral reform is a vital first step to having the views of the progressive majority represented.” Another suggested that voter apathy is a problem we should solve: “I think it’s important to treat the election as something that belongs to all of us.”

Another key topic across the discussion areas is the worry that MPs aren’t accountable to their constituents. One participant said that “the parliamentary whip system generally means that they [MPs] end up representing the position of their party leadership, not that of those who they were elected to represent.” Could 38 Degrees take action to change this?

We’ve already had some memorable posts, too. Thanks to Nemone C for inspiring the ‘How much we should do’ discussion by titling their post “the optimism of the action is better than the pessimism of the thought.”

Please join in our discussion. All you need to do is fill in your details on this form: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/2010-election and we’ll send you login details within 24 hours.

Posted in 38 Degrees Blog Posts

Tags: , , ,

The election (survey) results

January 12th, 2010 by

Is it important that we work together in the run up to the UK General Election? Over the last few days thousands of us having been answering that question in the 38 Degrees election survey. We’ve just finished calculating up the results. A staggering 95% of us think it’s important that we take action.

So now what should we do? The next step for us is to work together to decide how we, as a movement of 60,000 people, should work together in the run up to the election.

Today we’re launching our election consultation. This is an online space where thousands of us can discuss our plans together. We’ve teamed up with Achordus, who are experts in enabling lots of people to discuss ideas together over the web. They’ve helped us create a unique online space where we can post ideas, read others’ ideas, prioritise options and discuss next steps.

Please go and get involved now. It’s really easy to get into the space. All you need to do is fill in your details on this form: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/2010-election and we’ll send you login details within 24 hours. So please go and get involved now.

Here are the survey results in full:
76.05% said it was “very important for us to work together during the General Election”
18.71% said it was “quite important for us to work together during the General Election”
3.74% were neutral on the idea that we work together during the General Election
0.5% thought it was “not important for us to work together during the General Election”
0.9% thought it was “not at all important for us to work together during the General Election”

Posted in 38 Degrees Blog Posts

Tags: , , ,

What could 38 Degrees do in the general election?

January 7th, 2010 by

Update: 95% of 38 Degrees members voted in an online survey that we should work together during the election. But what should we do? To give all members a chance to get involved we’ve launched an online consultation. To get involved sign up here

38 Degrees isn’t a political party. We don’t support a political party. Our members all have different political views, many of us support different parties, and many of us aren’t that keen on any of them.

But we do care what politicians do. The Westminster government has the power to act, or to fail to act, on issues that matter to us. Who’s in charge and what they do affects all our lives. Most of our people-powered campaigns have pushed the government to do something good, or stop doing something bad.

So where does the looming UK general election fit in? Is it a chance for us to work together as an independent, people-powered voice? Could an independent voice challenging all politicians be just what this election needs? Or is a general election, dominated be big-spend advertising and media spin, the very worst time for us to be trying to have an impact?

And if we do decide we should work together during the election, what should we do? Challenge all parties on their plans? Provide un-biased information about candidates’ records? Remind people to vote? Push candidates to support a specific policy? Maybe Recall? Something else entirely?

I’m glad that 38 Degrees is a member-driven organisation and I don’t have to work out these questions on my own. I’m looking forward to seeing what thousands of people think – please get involved and fill in the survey here: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/election/

Posted in 38 Degrees Blog Posts

Tags: , , ,