38 Degrees Logo38 Degrees Logo 38 Degrees Logo

NHS: Phone your MP today

June 10th, 2011 by

Call your MP

Photograph by psd (Flickr)

Things are moving fast. The press are reporting that David Cameron and Nick Clegg are trying to finalise changes to their NHS plans. The next few days are critical – we need to move quickly to influence their decisions.

It looks like Clegg and Cameron may try to push ahead with at least two of the most worrying parts of Andrew Lansley’s original plans. They’re still toying with imposing more competition from private health companies. And they’re still looking to scrap their legal duty to provide the same standard of healthcare to everyone wherever they live.

Together, we can persuade them to drop these dangerous bits of the plans. MPs don’t get a lot of phone calls from their voters. If thousands of us call them today, it will send shockwaves through parliament as MPs, Clegg and Cameron realise how determined we are to protect our NHS!

Can you phone your MP today? It’s quick and easy. Find their name, number, and tips for what to say, here:
http://www.38degrees.org.uk/phone-your-mp

Here’s some feedback from the hundreds of 38 Degrees members who have called their MP already today:

  • I left a message and received a call back in a very short time. They were very helpful and assured me my concerns would be passed on to my MP.
  • I got straight through on the first ring, but my MP was in his constituency. His very polite assistant asked me to send an email, which I am going to do. I will mention in the email that I called. It really didn’t take long and I encourage everyone to pick up the phone.
  • Got through to my MPs nice and polite researcher who seemed rather surprised to get a call from an actual constituent. `Please tell Mr Brokenshire NOT to let his bosses back out of their present NHS legal duties and that I certainly DON’T want a US-style health system in my country! No one voted for that.’
  • Polite young man in Neil Carmichael’s office in Westminster took notes and read back my specific concerns. It was good to be well prepared. And important to be gracious. Worth doing, I felt. Took 3 minutes max.
  • Really easy to get through to Paul Blomfield’s office. Staff member took my message and assured me that I would receive a reply.
  • Couldn’t speak to Kris directly but left a message with my concerns. They said they would be passed on. they also said their phones were a bit busy right now!
  • Ok, got straight through to House of Commons. Answer machine on my MP’s line. Not sure I’ll have time to ring later so left a long message outlining my concerns to her. I used the prompts from the website, which fit with my concerns perfectly. Hope she gets the message
  • I have tried 4 times this morning to speak with my MP Nick Boles. Line has been busy so looks like the messages are getting across!
  • Esther McVey away spoke to an assistant who listened. Local constituency rand me back immediately and asked me to write or e-mail.

It’s quick and easy to call your MP. Find all the details you need here: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/phone-your-mp


Update 1 – Here are some more details notes that might be helpful when you call your MP

Issue 1. Threat to Government’s duty to provide a comprehensive health service

Key points:

  • The NHS bill proposes to scrap the legal duty on all governments to provide a comprehensive health service. This rule was the cornerstone in creating the NHS over 60 years ago.
  • The government is dropping this rule to allow NHS contracts to be given to private firms who may not provide the same level of service across the country, which might make the “postcode lottery” even worse.
  • The bill proposes to allow GP groups to provide (or not provide) services that they think are best or most cost effective. Governments won’t be legally required to provide a comprehensive health service in future.

What to ask your MP
Do you support the retention in the bill of the legal duty upon the Secretary of State to provide a comprehensive health service?

If your MP says disagrees with you, here’s a reply you can use:
Many health experts are very concerned that the changes will undermine the ability of the NHS to provide consistent care across the country.
The group that represents GPs said that the reforms risk unravelling the NHS.

More information is available here: http://www.dutytoprovide.net/

Issue 2. Competition in the NHS

Key points

The government’s current proposals would establish the NHS’s main regulator, Monitor, as an “economic regulator” focused on competition. This is currently in “Clause 60″ of the Bill.

  • Price competition could lead to a ‘race to the bottom’ in terms of quality of care, and could lead to more expensive, but more effective, treatments being ruled out of the NHS altogether.
  • The British Medical Association, along with many others, is warning that this clause would be extremely damaging to the NHS: “Monitor’s key task must be to maintain access to high quality patient care, rather than promoting competition. Only by removing the duty on Monitor to promote competition can it be ensured that commissioners and providers are given the freedom to operate in the best interests of their patients.”
  • We need to persuade MPs to vote against the “competition clause” and support regulation which instead focuses on ensuring high quality healthcare for everyone.

What to ask your MP
Will you vote against the “competition clause” and instead support regulation which prioritises ensuring quality healthcare for everyone?

If your MP disagrees with you, here’s a reply you can use:

  • The role of Monitor is crucial here and it has not yet been agreed that this will be amended.
  • The bill still contains powers for commissioning bodies to agree lower prices and it’s not clear quite how price competition will be outlawed. The government needs to be much clearer on this.
  • The NHS will still be left with higher costs than private firms. Private firms won’t bother with treating expensive, difficult cases.

 

Posted in 38 Degrees Blog Posts

Tags:

  • Jjgalwayliveirishmusic

    we must introduce more wisdom and not politics into this great big ship that we all share

  • Munrois

    Like what  38 Degrees are trying to do  regarding NHS reforms.  
    Nick and David would like to call it reform unfortunately its destruction, opening up the doors for private enterprise to screw JOE PUBLIC YET AGAIN. . The people of this nation have been repeatedly abused by a succession of governments past and very much present, we ALL know of old the NHS is the whipping boy for government it may not be the best but WE are still the envy of the world when we get sick or get an injury.LEAVE OUR NHS ALONE, and get back to stealing from the public purse, they should all be sacked.   

  • Dol

    I fully agree with Munrois on all his/her points, the NHS has always been the easy target for governments. Of course it costs a lot to run ! –  its very labour intensive,  medical supply  & technology intensive. I must add that yes , unfortunateley, labour costs have soared over the years and in NO small part due to exponential increases in clerical and managerial posts and costs, over the past 25+ years.
     Also since  Cameron- vat increase to 20% has affected costs for healthcare supplies/ equipment. 
    This government is a disgrace.

  • Peter

    As a life long Labour supporter I am disgusted that I haven’t heard one mention from the Labour Party about the clause to scrape the government’s “legal duty to provide a comprehensive health service”. Does this mean that they agree with it? Does this mean that their defence of the NHS is just political posturing? Lets put some presure on Labour MPs to stand up and defend THEIR NHS. Peter in Exeter

  • R Davison707

    Cameron and Clegg seem to be Hell bent on wrecking the NHS please , we must stop them at all costs.
    R. Davison pe34 3dr

  • Angela Lynch

    Was put through tp Charles. Kennedy’s secretary. Made the main points as advised. Was told that MP’s are in a “wait and see” situation. However – made the point that any threat of introduction of privatization or erosion of local services would be fought, tooth and nail , by constituants so he’d better be fully prepared to represent our views or face our wrath !! 

  • Htspence

    From: htspence@hotmail.com
    To: nigel.adams.mp@parliament.uk
    Subject: National Health Service.
    Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:06:23 +0100

    Nigel,

    As my local MP, I am dropping you this brief communication to express my deep concern re the Governments current proposals for the NHS.

    These proposals have been universally criticised by all sector’s ( inclusive of the GP’s on who the Government is depending to implement most of the changes it is proposing ) of the nation.

    The NHS is the nations “Holy Grail” and must remain “Free & Universally Available To All when needed, irrespective of the individual’s ability to pay”. Anyone, whether an individual MP or a Government that forgets this self evident truth does so at the peril of their long term political future.

    If the report’s are true that the Government intends to “scrap their legal duty to provide the same level of healthcare to everyone”, then it will be remembered by the Nation as a truly reactionary body, and will ultimately receive the appropriate sanction at the ballot box.
    The Government instead should be addressing the impact of the “Post Code” lottery system, which currently afflicts the NHS across the board, on medical standards / treatments. This system needs to be eliminated. Regional bodies should not be able to digress from agreed national standards once these have been established. This is an area where the Government could receive favourable kudos, but seems to be largely ignored by it.

    We all know that there are areas of waste within the NHS – especially where the various tier’s of administration / management have been imposed by Government (of what ever political persuasion) over the last two & half decades, to the detriment of the front line services – both at a Regional & National level. Also, with regards to the procurement processes for: -

    external services.building developments.drug procurement.

    but the “privatisation” of this Institution, whether direct or indirect must be resisted at all cost’s.

    The “private sector” has a role to play within the NHS, but this must alway’s remain subservient & secondary. The “profit” factor must never be allowed to rule in any way.

    Regards,

    Henry T. Spence