38 Degrees Logo38 Degrees Logo 38 Degrees Logo

Energy Bill: where was Ben Wallace MP?

July 2nd, 2010 by

Ben Wallace MP in parliament: but where was he on the day of the crucial energy bill vote?

38 Degrees member Phil Milston has been in touch to let us know about the bizarre response he got from his MP’s office to one of the campaigns we ran back in February.

About 5,000 of us emailed our MPs to ask them to vote for our amendment to make sure the Energy Bill included an Emissions Performance Standard for new power stations. By setting limits on emissions we wanted to make sure the new generation of ‘cleaner’ coal-fired power stations lived up to their name. Phil was pleased to hear from his MP, Ben Wallace (Conservative), that “I fully agree with your assertion that it is important to include an EPS in the Energy Bill”.

So when our amendment was defeated by just eight votes, Phil was disappointed to find that Ben Wallace hadn’t bothered to show up and vote for it. Where was he? After receiving no response to his enquiries, Phil eventually received a reply from Ben Wallace’s PA last week to say:

“At the last election the boundaries of the Lancaster and Wyre constituency were redrawn and two new constituencies created. Mr Wallace was elected last month as the Member of Parliament for Wyre and Preston North and as such is no longer your MP. I would, therefore, suggest that you contact your new Member of Parliament.”

We’ve copied the full correspondence below.

If you’re one of Ben Wallace’s new constituents, why not ask him where he was? You can contact him at wallaceb@parliament.uk or call his PA on 0207 219 5804. And if you’ve had a similar experience with your own MP, please let us know!

Phil’s correspondence with Ben Wallace MP

Begin forwarded message:
From: phil milston
To: Ben WALLACE
Subject: Fwd: Reply from Ben Wallace MP

Hi Zoe,

As stated, my enquiry was specifically aimed at Mr Wallace and his support for, then absence from the vote.

He was our MP at the time and as such remains accountable for his actions regarding this issue.

All I’m looking for is an explanation of his actions. Why are Mr Wallace and yourself being evasive?

I look forward to your reply

Regards – Phil Milston

—–Original Message—–
From: ASHWORTH, Zoe
To: ‘phil milston’
Sent: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:25
Subject: Carbon emissions

Dear Mr Milston,

Thank you for your email in support of an Emissions Performance Standard.

You may be aware that at the last election the boundaries of the Lancaster and Wyre constituency were redrawn and two new constituencies created (Lancaster & Fleetwood and Wyre & Preston North). Mr Wallace was elected last month as the Member of Parliament for Wyre and Preston North and as such is no longer your MP.

I would, therefore, suggest that you contact your new Member of Parliament, Eric Ollerenshaw, if you would like to raise your concerns about carbon emissions.

Kind regards,

Zoe Ashworth
PA to Ben Wallace MP
Member of Parliament for Wyre and Preston North

Dear Mr Wallace,

Are you ever going to reply on this issue or will it become an embarrassment that will resurface to haunt you?

Begin forwarded message:
From: phil milston
Date: 29 March 2010 18:51:53 BST
To: Ben WALLACE
Subject: Fwd: Reply from Ben Wallace MP

Dear Mr Wallace,

I still await your response to the request for information below…..

Regards,

Phil Milston

Begin forwarded message:

Dear Mr Wallace,

I was most encouraged to recieve your reply quoted below. It was with great disappointment that I then found out that you did not bother to vote on this issue.

I would be most grateful if you would explain your actions.

Regards,

Phil Milston

On 23 Feb 2010, at 10:17, WALLACE, Ben wrote:

Dear Mr Milston,

Thank you for your letter about the Energy Bill and the inclusion of an Emissions Performance Standard (EPS).

I very much share your view that climate change is one of the greatest threats we face and reducing UK carbon emissions is an important contribution to reducing the global risk of climate change. I fully agree with your assertion that it is important to include an EPS in the Energy Bill. We have advocated introducing an EPS for a long time and, despite efforts to get it included in both the previous Energy Act 2008 and the Climate Change Act 2008, failed due to a lack of Government support.

You may be aware that we have already tabled a Conservative amendment in the form of New Clause 2 to include an EPS in the Bill. Furthermore, we would – if in Government – adhere to our commitment to introduce an EPS.

Whilst the Government has dithered over its approach to Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), this Party has long supported your view that any new coal fired power stations must be fitted with CCS technology from day one and we will also restrict the emissions produced from power stations using an Emissions Performance Standard.

We envisage taking the most highly polluting, high carbon producing fuel of all and transforming it into a low carbon fuel of the future. Britain is blessed with large coal reserves, so there could be big benefits for our economy in cleaning up coal power. An incoming Conservative Government would contribute towards the creation of a national CCS infrastructure, allowing energy companies to plug in new CCS power stations making the UK a world leader in this technology.

Clean coal represents an element of our approach which rests on diversified energy supply made up of a wide variety of low-carbon technologies including large scale renewables and domestic micro-generation. This way we aim to re-build the British economy on the back of new, high-tech green industries, intelligent energy generation and transport, and energy efficiency in our homes, schools and businesses

Once again, thank you for taking the time to write to me.

Kind regards,

BEN WALLACE

Posted in 38 Degrees Blog Posts

Tags: , , , ,

  • Pcrobinson44

    What a tosser …. the MP!

  • Yesterdayz_man

    Never received a single response to any emails or letters I've sent to MPs. Labour safe seat = Couldn't care less.

  • Guest

    Too many MP's are apparent;y in it from self interest. They pay lip service to various causes then do SFA about it when they get the opportunity.

  • Blah

    Mr Wallace,
    You are a democratically elected representative of your constituents, not an unaccountable dictator, what have you got to hide? Never forget that the people who voted you in can also vote you out.

  • Blah

    Why does the MP for Wyre and Preston North have a picture of the Lune valley at the top of his website? That hair looks like it was photoshopped in aswell!

  • Ericjoyce

    Is there room in your analysis, I wonder, for the simple administrative fact that Ben Wallace wasn't your supporters MP when the latter wrote his most recent letter? MPs deal with constituency enquiries and Wallace's reply was not only in order, it was what the rules of the House of Commons lay down. I have no idea why Wallace wasn't at the vote, but in my experience it likely that it was for a reason other than simply not being 'bothered'. Why not have a supporter who is actually one of Wallace's constituents write to him? The overarching point, I suppose, is that internet campaigns are now part of mainstream political dialogue, but they do risk undermining themselves when they make simplistic, red-top-like assumptions about what motivates and informs politicians. I'm afraid your leader is followed below by equally less than thoughtful comments which for some reason appear to take joy in personalising an otherwise important, and quite complex, area of public policy. It's not at all clear to me how that helps further any cause at all.

  • Davidb

    Hi Eric,

    Great to see you engaging with our site – I think you may be the first MP to comment on our blog, so welcome.

    “The simple administrative” fact to which you refer (Ben Wallace not being Phil Miston's MP) only applied the 4th time which Phil Miston contacted Ben Wallace. The first 3 times he contacted him, Ben Wallace was his MP yet Ben Wallace did not reply. Surely the point of the HoC protocols is not to encourage MPs to ignore constituents' legitimate questions until boundary changes mean they're no longer their MP?

    It's unfortunate that Mr Wallace's assistant was able to reply eventually to tell Phil he was no longer a constituent, but on no occasion was able to answer the earlier question – which had been put to Ben Wallace repeatedly whilst Phil was still a constituent, about earlier correspondance between the two of them which had taken place whilst Phil was a constituent, about a vote which took place whilst Phil was a constituent.

    As to why Ben Wallace didn't vote, the post does suggest current constituents get in touch to ask him. Ben Wallace's original email certainly gives the impression that he supports the ammendment – surely it's legitimate for Phil to then raise the question of why he replied expressing support but then didn't vote? The ammendment only fell by 8 votes so a few more MPs turning up could have made every difference.

    Like you, we have “no idea why Wallace wasn't at the vote”. If he does have a good reason (and as you note there certainly could be good reasons for missing a vote) it's a shame he hasn't shared it already. As a fellow MP if you happen to bump into him it would be great if you could encourage him to reply to Phil Miston properly – we'd be happy to post any such reply up here.

    Agree that it's always good to approach these issues thoughtfully. It's also important that MPs are properly accountable. On this occasion, to be blunt, Ben Wallace told a constituent he supported something, the constituent enquired as to why he hadn't therefore voted for it, and Ben Wallace chose not to reply for several months. That's not a great way to build trust and respect with the electorate. I can see why MPs might prefer such things not to make it on to web sites, but I'm not sure I understand what broader causes it is harmful to.

  • Phil Milston

    Eric.. Ben Wallace was my MP when I first asked him to account for his whereabouts.
    His continued dismissal of my enquiries only served to make me more determined to get to the bottom of this issue.
    I'm sure there is a perfectly simple explanation for the whole sorry saga, but why won't Mr Wallace just let me know? It just seems to be a rather shoddy way to treat the people he claims to represent.
    The whole point of posting this issue to 38 degrees was to see if Ben Wallace could be stirred into accountability – evidently not! and that should be worrying for all voters.

  • Phil Milston

    Eric.. Ben Wallace was my MP when I first asked him to account for his whereabouts.
    His continued dismissal of my enquiries only served to make me more determined to get to the bottom of this issue.
    I'm sure there is a perfectly simple explanation for the whole sorry saga, but why won't Mr Wallace just let me know? It just seems to be a rather shoddy way to treat the people he claims to represent.
    The whole point of posting this issue to 38 degrees was to see if Ben Wallace could be stirred into accountability – evidently not! and that should be worrying for all voters.