<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10,000 condemn the Digital Economy Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/</link>
	<description>38 Degrees brings you together with other people to take action on the issues that matter to you and bring about real change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawrencepatterson</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>lawrencepatterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>I find this objectional that there is no real debate on these matters -- speedy ill thought out legislation will come back to bite us all -- Bills like this need to fall by the wayside until a new government is elected and proper consideration given to the the issues -- is this another Act that the Home Office has no clue how it will administer or enforce??
&lt;br&gt;I have no functioning MP representing me -- Ms Moran (Luton South) went AWOL last May!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this objectional that there is no real debate on these matters &#8212; speedy ill thought out legislation will come back to bite us all &#8212; Bills like this need to fall by the wayside until a new government is elected and proper consideration given to the the issues &#8212; is this another Act that the Home Office has no clue how it will administer or enforce??<br />
<br />I have no functioning MP representing me &#8212; Ms Moran (Luton South) went AWOL last May!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Issue 7 news</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Issue 7 news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>[...] 10,000 condemn the digital economy bill in 48 hours, Dribbble announces that it&#8217;s going public and Microsoft announces IE9. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10,000 condemn the digital economy bill in 48 hours, Dribbble announces that it&#8217;s going public and Microsoft announces IE9. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawrencepatterson</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>lawrencepatterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>I find this objectional that there is no real debate on these matters -- speedy ill thought out legislation will come back to bite us all -- Bills like this need to fall by the wayside until a new government is elected and proper consideration given to the the issues -- is this another Act that the Home Office has no clue how it will administer or enforce??&lt;br&gt;I have no functioning MP representing me -- Ms Moran (Luton South) went AWOL last May!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this objectional that there is no real debate on these matters &#8212; speedy ill thought out legislation will come back to bite us all &#8212; Bills like this need to fall by the wayside until a new government is elected and proper consideration given to the the issues &#8212; is this another Act that the Home Office has no clue how it will administer or enforce??<br />I have no functioning MP representing me &#8212; Ms Moran (Luton South) went AWOL last May!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>My MP is Harriet Harman herself. I wrote to her two weeks ago and have not yet received a reply. I have written to her once before and received a pretty quick response.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So well done Harriet. One extra vote for Columba Blango in the coming election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My MP is Harriet Harman herself. I wrote to her two weeks ago and have not yet received a reply. I have written to her once before and received a pretty quick response.</p>
<p>So well done Harriet. One extra vote for Columba Blango in the coming election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuumei</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>yuumei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-994</guid>
		<description>Same here. Labour again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here. Labour again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: naheem</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>naheem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Okay, another reply from my MP, very useful! Below is the letter and I have also uploaded the two attachments sent with it to rapidshare for you all to read. The first link is an outline of the Wash-Up procedure and the second is the actual Digital Economy Bill (Research Paper, March 29).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rapidshare.com/files/369949831/snpc-05398.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://rapidshare.com/files/369949831/snpc-0539...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rapidshare.com/files/369950074/RP10-030.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://rapidshare.com/files/369950074/RP10-030.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For your information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ian Hughes&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From: DANBY, Grahame&lt;br&gt;Sent: 30 March 2010 11:30&lt;br&gt;To: HUGHES, Ian&lt;br&gt;Subject: FW: Digital Economy Bill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You asked about the prospects for the Digital Economy Bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Bill is provisionally scheduled to have its second reading in the House of Commons next Tuesday (6 April).  After this, according to some press reports, it might go into the “wash-up” – allowing it to reach the statute book after relatively little further debate.  Were this to happen it has been reported that some provisions in the Bill will be lost, though the online copyright provisions are thought likely to survive in some form.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The note below details the procedures involved:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-05398.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/b...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Grahame Danby&lt;br&gt;House of Commons Library&lt;br&gt;1 Derby Gate&lt;br&gt;London SW1A 2DG&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;T: 020 7219 3691&lt;br&gt;E: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:danbyg@parliament.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;danbyg@parliament.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;W: &lt;a href=&quot;http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ian Hughes&lt;br&gt;Researcher to Roger Godsiff MP&lt;br&gt;Tel 0207 219 5191&lt;br&gt;Fx  0207 219 2221&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:hughesi@parliament.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hughesi@parliament.uk&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Birmingham Constituency Office:&lt;br&gt;Gulbahar Khan 07889 650544&lt;br&gt;Maggie Novell  0121 603 2299&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:novellm@parliament.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;novellm@parliament.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WebSite : www. Roger Godsiff MP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, another reply from my MP, very useful! Below is the letter and I have also uploaded the two attachments sent with it to rapidshare for you all to read. The first link is an outline of the Wash-Up procedure and the second is the actual Digital Economy Bill (Research Paper, March 29).</p>
<p><a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/369949831/snpc-05398.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.com/files/369949831/snpc-0539&#8230;</a><br /><a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/369950074/RP10-030.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.com/files/369950074/RP10-030.pdf</a></p>
<p>For your information.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Ian Hughes</p>
<p>From: DANBY, Grahame<br />Sent: 30 March 2010 11:30<br />To: HUGHES, Ian<br />Subject: FW: Digital Economy Bill</p>
<p>You asked about the prospects for the Digital Economy Bill.</p>
<p>The Bill is provisionally scheduled to have its second reading in the House of Commons next Tuesday (6 April).  After this, according to some press reports, it might go into the “wash-up” – allowing it to reach the statute book after relatively little further debate.  Were this to happen it has been reported that some provisions in the Bill will be lost, though the online copyright provisions are thought likely to survive in some form.</p>
<p>The note below details the procedures involved:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-05398.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/b&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Grahame Danby<br />House of Commons Library<br />1 Derby Gate<br />London SW1A 2DG</p>
<p>T: 020 7219 3691<br />E: <a href="mailto:danbyg@parliament.uk" rel="nofollow">danbyg@parliament.uk</a><br />W: <a href="http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk/</a></p>
<p>Ian Hughes<br />Researcher to Roger Godsiff MP<br />Tel 0207 219 5191<br />Fx  0207 219 2221<br /><a href="mailto:hughesi@parliament.uk" rel="nofollow">hughesi@parliament.uk</a> </p>
<p>Birmingham Constituency Office:<br />Gulbahar Khan 07889 650544<br />Maggie Novell  0121 603 2299<br /><a href="mailto:novellm@parliament.uk" rel="nofollow">novellm@parliament.uk</a></p>
<p>WebSite : www. Roger Godsiff MP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-992</guid>
		<description>I got a reply from my MP as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AND it was useful !&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However...though this cause has gotten publicity, we dont have enough...yet &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;===============&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many thanks for your email regarding the Digital Economy Bill.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;I have written to the Minister outlining your concerns, and hope to be able to send you a copy of his response once I have received it.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Please provide me with an address so that I can send you this once I have received it. Providing an address also helps me keep my records accurate and up to date.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;If there is anything you wish to discuss or if I can be of any further assistance, in this matter or any other, please do not hesitate to contact me.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Yours sincerely,&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;JOHN MANN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a reply from my MP as well.</p>
<p>AND it was useful !</p>
<p>However&#8230;though this cause has gotten publicity, we dont have enough&#8230;yet </p>
<p>===============</p>
<p>Many thanks for your email regarding the Digital Economy Bill.</p>
<p>I have written to the Minister outlining your concerns, and hope to be able to send you a copy of his response once I have received it.</p>
<p>Please provide me with an address so that I can send you this once I have received it. Providing an address also helps me keep my records accurate and up to date.</p>
<p>If there is anything you wish to discuss or if I can be of any further assistance, in this matter or any other, please do not hesitate to contact me.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely,</p>
<p>JOHN MANN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Reply from Conservative MP Grant Shapps&#039; office:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for contacting Grant Shapps MP about the Digital Economy Bill. Grant read your thoughts with interest and asked me to respond on his behalf.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;For nearly twelve years, the Government has neglected this crucial area of our economy. Conservatives believe a huge amount needs to be done to give the UK a modern regulatory environment for the digital and creative industries. Whilst we welcome aspects of the bill there are other areas of great concern to us.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;We want to make sure that Britain has the most favourable intellectual framework in the world for innovators, digital content creators and high tech businesses. We recognise the need to tackle digital piracy and make it possible for people to buy and sell digital intellectual property online. However, it is vital that any anti-piracy measures promote new business models rather than holding innovation back. This must not be about propping up existing business models but creating an environment that allows new ones to develop. That is why we were opposed to the original clause 17 and are still opposed to clause 29 which props up ITV regional news with BBC Licence Fee payers money.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;The Government’s failure to introduce the Bill until the eleventh hour of this Parliament has given rise to considerable concern that we no longer have the time to scrutinise the many controversial and detailed measures outlined in their proposals. We fully appreciate these concerns. In certain areas, including measures to allow website blocking in certain carefully proscribed circumstances, there has been substantial debate in the House of Lords. However, Grant believes they should be debated in the House of Commons before we agree to them and so shares your concerns. Conservatives will only support the measures proposed in the Bill if we are confident that they have been given the scrutiny they deserve.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Please rest assured that Grant&#039;s colleagues in the Shadow Culture, Media and Sport and Shadow Business, Innovation and Skills teams will do everything in their power to work towards legislation that strengthens our digital sector and provides the security that our businesses and consumers so desperately need.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact Grant. Please do not hesitate to get in touch again about this or any other matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply from Conservative MP Grant Shapps&#39; office:</p>
<p>Thank you for contacting Grant Shapps MP about the Digital Economy Bill. Grant read your thoughts with interest and asked me to respond on his behalf.</p>
<p>For nearly twelve years, the Government has neglected this crucial area of our economy. Conservatives believe a huge amount needs to be done to give the UK a modern regulatory environment for the digital and creative industries. Whilst we welcome aspects of the bill there are other areas of great concern to us.</p>
<p>We want to make sure that Britain has the most favourable intellectual framework in the world for innovators, digital content creators and high tech businesses. We recognise the need to tackle digital piracy and make it possible for people to buy and sell digital intellectual property online. However, it is vital that any anti-piracy measures promote new business models rather than holding innovation back. This must not be about propping up existing business models but creating an environment that allows new ones to develop. That is why we were opposed to the original clause 17 and are still opposed to clause 29 which props up ITV regional news with BBC Licence Fee payers money.</p>
<p>The Government’s failure to introduce the Bill until the eleventh hour of this Parliament has given rise to considerable concern that we no longer have the time to scrutinise the many controversial and detailed measures outlined in their proposals. We fully appreciate these concerns. In certain areas, including measures to allow website blocking in certain carefully proscribed circumstances, there has been substantial debate in the House of Lords. However, Grant believes they should be debated in the House of Commons before we agree to them and so shares your concerns. Conservatives will only support the measures proposed in the Bill if we are confident that they have been given the scrutiny they deserve.</p>
<p>Please rest assured that Grant&#39;s colleagues in the Shadow Culture, Media and Sport and Shadow Business, Innovation and Skills teams will do everything in their power to work towards legislation that strengthens our digital sector and provides the security that our businesses and consumers so desperately need.</p>
<p>Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact Grant. Please do not hesitate to get in touch again about this or any other matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Written to my mp, Tony Lloyd, three times. No replies and guess what? yes he&#039;s New Labour...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Written to my mp, Tony Lloyd, three times. No replies and guess what? yes he&#39;s New Labour&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Robertson</title>
		<link>http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/2010/03/19/10000-condemn-the-digital-economy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>David Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.38degrees.org.uk/?p=709#comment-988</guid>
		<description>Ah, at least one Labour MP has seen the light.  Thanks for sharing the letter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, at least one Labour MP has seen the light.  Thanks for sharing the letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

