38 Degrees Logo38 Degrees Logo 38 Degrees Logo

10,000 condemn the Digital Economy Bill

March 19th, 2010 by

In the last 48 hours 38 Degrees members have send an avalanche of 10,000 to their MPs voicing widespread concern about the Digital Economy Bill.  Why are so many of us so concerned that we’re moved to take action?
This week politicians told 38 Degrees that those opposing the bill of being “web anarchists”. This is a convenient way for them to avoid the many concerns the public has about this bill. We’re concerned that the government is pushing a complex bill through without addressing our legitimate concerns. Wash-up (the process the Government is using to force the bill through) is a problematic process at the best of times, in that it removes scrutiny from legislation. For our members the idea that you’d strip down the scrutiny and debate over such a complex bill that gives unprecedented new powers to the Government is deeply worrying.
The bill contains a wish list of new powers that would (amongst many things) give the government power to disconnect millions, block websites, create the potential for backdoor censorship and spell the death of open WiFi (http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/27/uk-digital-economy-b.html). Schools, libraries and businesses could see their connection cut if their pupils, readers of customers infringe any copyright.
One group is very keen on it though, the music industry. Early this month it was uncovered that parts of the bill have been copied word for word from a draft “suggestion” written by the music industry lobbyist group, the BPI. (http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/11/digital-economy-bill-amendment-lobbyists). In a leaked memo (http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/11/digital-economy-bill-amendment-lobbyists) a few days ago the same lobbyists admitted the only way to get the bill through would be to rush it through without a real parliamentary debate. Those opposing the bill we have a growing and powerful movement of companies, libraries, consumer groups and of course us, the public. Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Virgin, Orange, eBay, BT, Yahoo all came together earlier this month to voice their concern about this bill.   (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9cd79f4c-2ba7-11df-a5c7-00144feabdc0.html).
We’ve teamed up with Open Rights Group (ORG) to oppose the bill. As Jim Killock, ORG’s Executive Director says:
At the fag end of this Parliament, disastrous laws to disconnect families from the internet and introduce web censorship powers that we haven’t even seen, could get passed into law without proper debate.
Serious laws, that would disrupt people’s freedom of speech and their daily lives, and potentially create new web censorship powers, deserve proper scrutiny and debate. Anything less is undemocratic and unaccountable, not to mention deeply irresponsible.
That is why 38 Degrees is joining the Open Rights Groups’ call for a proper open debate on this Bill. Please write to your MP now to demand that this Bill is properly debated.”
The Government is right to attempt to tackle the many issues surrounding the internet. But to rush these complex new measures through Parliament is wrong. To think that they could rush them through before a general election without anyone noticing is naïve. This law needs a real debate, it needs parliamentary scrutiny. That’s why ten thousand of us have written to our MPs.
If you haven’t done so already now is the time to write to your MP and tell them why we oppose the Digital Economy Bill: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/digital-economy-bill

In the last 48 hours 38 Degrees members have sent an avalanche of 10,000 to their MPs voicing widespread concern about the Digital Economy Bill.  Why are so many of us so concerned that we’re moved to take action?

This week politicians said that those opposing the bill are “web anarchists”. This is a convenient way for them to avoid the many concerns the public has about this bill. We’re concerned that the government is pushing a complex bill through without addressing our legitimate concerns.

The government is planning to use a special ”fast track” process designed for the weeks before a election to pass urgent and uncontroversial measures, to force thorough these dubious new powers. This process is problematic at the best of times,  because it removes democratic checks. For our members the idea that you’d strip down the scrutiny and debate over such a complex bill that gives unprecedented new powers to the Government is deeply worrying.

The bill contains a wish list of new powers that would (amongst many things) give the government power to disconnect millions of people, block websites, create the potential for back-door censorship and spell the death of open WiFi. Even  Schools and libraries could see their internet cut off if people infringe any copyright.

One group is very keen on it though, the music industry. Early this month it was uncovered that parts of the bill have been copied word for word from a draft “suggestion” written by the music industry lobbyist group, the BPI.  In a leaked memo a few days ago the same lobbyists admitted the only way to get the bill through would be to rush it through without a real parliamentary debate.

Those opposing the bill are a growing and powerful movement of companies, libraries, consumer groups and of course us, the public. Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Virgin, Orange, eBay and BT all came together earlier this month to voice their concern about this bill.

We’ve teamed up with Open Rights Group (ORG) to oppose the bill. As Jim Killock, ORG’s Executive Director says:

“At the fag end of this Parliament, disastrous laws to disconnect families from the internet and introduce web censorship powers that we haven’t even seen, could get passed into law without proper debate.

Serious laws, that would disrupt people’s freedom of speech and their daily lives, and potentially create new web censorship powers, deserve proper scrutiny and debate. Anything less is undemocratic and unaccountable, not to mention deeply irresponsible.

That is why 38 Degrees is joining the Open Rights Groups’ call for a proper open debate on this Bill. Please write to your MP now to demand that this Bill is properly debated.”

The Government is right to attempt to tackle the many issues surrounding the internet. But to rush these complex new measures through Parliament is wrong. To think that they could rush them through before a general election without anyone noticing is naïve. This law needs a real debate, it needs parliamentary scrutiny. That’s why ten thousand of us have written to our MPs.

If you haven’t done so already now is the time to write to your MP and tell them why we oppose the Digital Economy Bill: http://www.38degrees.org.uk/digital-economy-bill

Posted in 38 Degrees Blog Posts

Tags: , , , , ,

  • observer

    basically if this bill gets passed under the radar, I will refuse to pay any taxes to this illigitament government. If they can make up the rules when and where they see fit so can we
    10,000 should form a new community, build up from the land, our place our rules. if it gets past their will be a public uprising when they awaken to the realities of what has been forced onto the innocent and free
    if this is deemed an inappropriate response we will all just move to other countries without dictatorial leaders. stop digital economy now before it is too late
    money can't stop digital economy now, it is only people voting with their feet and clickers can make a difference

  • dunxd

    Right, I wrote to my MP, got a reply. Now what?

  • http://www.38degrees.org.uk/ David

    Great! please send it to mpreplies@38degreees.org.uk

  • cherrybaby01

    OK our household of three received three replies today all via Royal Mail & not via Email in response to the email we sent. Surely if you email someone you expect a response via email? If 10,000 people have emailed their MP & they all receive a reply on very expensive paper with a 1st class stamp this is surely another waste of our taxes. Before I start ranting about how my hard earned cash is wasted can someone tell me if in 2010 there is a reason why MPs do not replying via email?

  • OhNo

    At least you got a reply, I didn't, the New Labour goon.

  • Ed

    Me neither. Also a New Labour MP.

  • naheem

    I got a reply from my MP today. It was an email which simply said: “This letter was emailed to the Leader of the House today.” and attached was this:

    29 March 2010

    The Rt Hon Harriet Harman QC MP
    Leader of the House of Commons, Lord Privy Seal
    Minister for Women and Equality
    House of Commons
    London SW1A OAA

    Dear Harriet

    Re Digital Economy Bill

    I am sure that you are aware that the Digital Economy Bill is becoming a serious political issue in advance of the General Election, particularly so if it is the Government’s intention to push this through without debate in the ‘Washup’.

    I hope that the Government will see the wisdom of leaving this measure till another day and ensuring a proper opportunity for debate otherwise I regret that I will not be able to support the measure in any shape or form.

    Regards

    Yours sincerely

    Roger Godsiff MP
    Tel 0207 219 5191
    Fax 0207 219 2221
    hughesi@parliament.uk

  • http://www.scot-image.co.uk/ David Robertson

    Ah, at least one Labour MP has seen the light. Thanks for sharing the letter.

  • Jonathan Pritchard

    Written to my mp, Tony Lloyd, three times. No replies and guess what? yes he's New Labour…

  • David

    Reply from Conservative MP Grant Shapps' office:

    Thank you for contacting Grant Shapps MP about the Digital Economy Bill. Grant read your thoughts with interest and asked me to respond on his behalf.

    For nearly twelve years, the Government has neglected this crucial area of our economy. Conservatives believe a huge amount needs to be done to give the UK a modern regulatory environment for the digital and creative industries. Whilst we welcome aspects of the bill there are other areas of great concern to us.

    We want to make sure that Britain has the most favourable intellectual framework in the world for innovators, digital content creators and high tech businesses. We recognise the need to tackle digital piracy and make it possible for people to buy and sell digital intellectual property online. However, it is vital that any anti-piracy measures promote new business models rather than holding innovation back. This must not be about propping up existing business models but creating an environment that allows new ones to develop. That is why we were opposed to the original clause 17 and are still opposed to clause 29 which props up ITV regional news with BBC Licence Fee payers money.

    The Government’s failure to introduce the Bill until the eleventh hour of this Parliament has given rise to considerable concern that we no longer have the time to scrutinise the many controversial and detailed measures outlined in their proposals. We fully appreciate these concerns. In certain areas, including measures to allow website blocking in certain carefully proscribed circumstances, there has been substantial debate in the House of Lords. However, Grant believes they should be debated in the House of Commons before we agree to them and so shares your concerns. Conservatives will only support the measures proposed in the Bill if we are confident that they have been given the scrutiny they deserve.

    Please rest assured that Grant's colleagues in the Shadow Culture, Media and Sport and Shadow Business, Innovation and Skills teams will do everything in their power to work towards legislation that strengthens our digital sector and provides the security that our businesses and consumers so desperately need.

    Once again, thank you for taking the time to contact Grant. Please do not hesitate to get in touch again about this or any other matter.

  • Kit

    I got a reply from my MP as well.

    AND it was useful !

    However…though this cause has gotten publicity, we dont have enough…yet

    ===============

    Many thanks for your email regarding the Digital Economy Bill.

    I have written to the Minister outlining your concerns, and hope to be able to send you a copy of his response once I have received it.

    Please provide me with an address so that I can send you this once I have received it. Providing an address also helps me keep my records accurate and up to date.

    If there is anything you wish to discuss or if I can be of any further assistance, in this matter or any other, please do not hesitate to contact me.

    Yours sincerely,

    JOHN MANN

  • naheem

    Okay, another reply from my MP, very useful! Below is the letter and I have also uploaded the two attachments sent with it to rapidshare for you all to read. The first link is an outline of the Wash-Up procedure and the second is the actual Digital Economy Bill (Research Paper, March 29).

    http://rapidshare.com/files/369949831/snpc-0539…
    http://rapidshare.com/files/369950074/RP10-030.pdf

    For your information.

    Regards

    Ian Hughes

    From: DANBY, Grahame
    Sent: 30 March 2010 11:30
    To: HUGHES, Ian
    Subject: FW: Digital Economy Bill

    You asked about the prospects for the Digital Economy Bill.

    The Bill is provisionally scheduled to have its second reading in the House of Commons next Tuesday (6 April). After this, according to some press reports, it might go into the “wash-up” – allowing it to reach the statute book after relatively little further debate. Were this to happen it has been reported that some provisions in the Bill will be lost, though the online copyright provisions are thought likely to survive in some form.

    The note below details the procedures involved:

    http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/b…

    Grahame Danby
    House of Commons Library
    1 Derby Gate
    London SW1A 2DG

    T: 020 7219 3691
    E: danbyg@parliament.uk
    W: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk/

    Ian Hughes
    Researcher to Roger Godsiff MP
    Tel 0207 219 5191
    Fx 0207 219 2221
    hughesi@parliament.uk

    Birmingham Constituency Office:
    Gulbahar Khan 07889 650544
    Maggie Novell 0121 603 2299
    novellm@parliament.uk

    WebSite : www. Roger Godsiff MP

  • http://yuumei.co.uk/ yuumei

    Same here. Labour again.

  • Mark

    My MP is Harriet Harman herself. I wrote to her two weeks ago and have not yet received a reply. I have written to her once before and received a pretty quick response.

    So well done Harriet. One extra vote for Columba Blango in the coming election.

  • lawrencepatterson

    I find this objectional that there is no real debate on these matters — speedy ill thought out legislation will come back to bite us all — Bills like this need to fall by the wayside until a new government is elected and proper consideration given to the the issues — is this another Act that the Home Office has no clue how it will administer or enforce??
    I have no functioning MP representing me — Ms Moran (Luton South) went AWOL last May!!

  • http://scrunchup.com/issue-7/news/ Issue 7 news

    [...] 10,000 condemn the digital economy bill in 48 hours, Dribbble announces that it’s going public and Microsoft announces IE9. [...]

  • lawrencepatterson

    I find this objectional that there is no real debate on these matters — speedy ill thought out legislation will come back to bite us all — Bills like this need to fall by the wayside until a new government is elected and proper consideration given to the the issues — is this another Act that the Home Office has no clue how it will administer or enforce??

    I have no functioning MP representing me — Ms Moran (Luton South) went AWOL last May!!